Was Freida Pinto’s New Movie Miral Moved From Oscar Race To March 2011 Due To White Jewish Racism?
I am very impressed with the trailer for Indian actress Freida Pinto’s new movie Miral. I just read Variety, it is so sad that Miral will NOT be released in December 2010, but March 2011!
According to media reports, since Miral received luke warm media reception from the Venice and Toronto Film Festivals the movie was pushed to next year.
Is anyone actually surprised that Miral was moved from a December 2010 release date to March 2011? The white Jews control the North American media
of course they don’t want the Jewish community to be viewed in a negative light.
The white Jewish director Julian Schnabel deserves a lot of credit for attempting to shine a light on the racism of the white Jewish community.
For far too long, white Jewish people are given a pass for their bigotry and racism.
The question remains why is the racism of the white Jews ignored in North America and the world?
The North American media want to bury Miral in the sand and hope the movie disappears. The white Jewish controlled media
doesn’t want the white Jewish community’s dirty laundry screened in the North American theatres.
The film Miral is based on the screenwriter Rula Jebreal’s novel. In 1948, after the separation of Palestine, the Israeli state was created and the Palestinian people were displaced. A Palestinian woman Hind Husseini saw fifty five oprhaned Palestinian children in the street. Ms. Husseni created a school called the Dar-Al Tifel Institute to educate Palestinian youth.
In the year 1978, the protagonist seven year old Miral’s father sends her to the Dar-Al Tifel Institute after her mother dies. Miral grows up at the Dar-Al Tifel Institute and at the age of seventeen she teaches Palestinian youth. However, Miral is sheltered, she doesn’t understand the magnitude of the racism and injustice Palestinian people experience in the racist anti Arab Israeli regime.
Miral meets a young Palestinian activist she falls in love, and her political consciousness emerges. However, Miral struggles with being a political activist and living by the non violent ideologies she was taught at school.
The mainstream press are not reporting the fact that white Jewish people hold powerful positions in the North American media. I am not surprised Miral was moved from the Oscar race. After all, do white Jews really want a movie released to a wide audience that exposes the incredible racism and injustice that Palestinians and other minorities experience in Israel?
I believe it is such a disservice that Miral was moved from the December 2nd 2010 release date! It is obvious that politics once again has a heavy role in relation to when movies are released.
The North American press don’t want the public to know about the apartheid regime that exists in Israel. For example, Palestinians have to provide identification cards at check points when they work in Israel. Israel is a modern day South Africa, but the world accepts the racism of white Jewish people because they have a stranglehold over the North American media.
There are also consequences when people speak out against white Jewish racism.
For example, recently, the Hispanic CNN reporter Rick Sanchez was fired because he dared to challenge the racism of the white American Jewish comedian Jon Stewart. Sanchez was just being honest, some of the most racist people in North America are the white Jews. However, the North American media want to deny the fact that some white Jews have incredible racial, social, economic, and political power in North America.
Why? Why was Rick Sanchez fired for speaking the truth?
The answer is obvious, CNN was afraid of upsetting the powerful white American Jewish community and that’s the real reason Rick Sanchez was fired from CNN.
In North America, white Jewish people are not a minority despite their foolish attempts to claim they experience a similar form of discrimination as people of colour. Yes, white Jewish people experienced racism in world war I & II, but this is the year 2010. White Jewish people are a part of the white majority they are NOT a minority.
Miral deals with the conflict between the Jewish and the Palestinian communities in Israel. I am very happy for Freida Pinto it is nice to see her headlining a movie. I must point out the director Julian Schnabel is Jewish, so this movie is not biased against Jewish people. Miral will finally expose the world to the racial and social injustice Palestinian people experience under the racist Israeli government regime.
CB Online Article: It Is Time For Canadians To Take Prostitution Seriously & Treat It Like A Business.
Sex trade
Opinion: The case for treating the sex trade as an industry
It’s not a question of whether we want prostitution in Canada. The issue is what kind of sex trade we ought to have.
Article Tools
Story Tools
Related Articles
Whether prostitution is really the oldest profession of all is debatable, but there’s no denying that it is a profession.
Whether we like it or not, there is a market value on sex in every human society, and there have always been people who make their living in that market. And in Canada, it’s perfectly legal to exchange money for sex. All our prohibitions are technical — no advertising, no operating a brothel, no pimping.
The effect has been to drive the sex market deeper into the shadows of Canadian society, which is exactly where most would prefer it stayed—all the better to go on ignoring it.
But that’s not going to be possible anymore. Ontario Superior Court Justice Susan Himel ruled last month that Canada’s prostitution laws have made the profession unconscionably dangerous. As such, she ruled that these laws violate the charter right to security of the person. The federal government quickly announced its intention to appeal, fuelled by the naive indignation of ministers claiming that the laws protect prostitutes.
So the debate has begun, and the early salvos have been highly emotional and based largely on morality. The argument boils roughly down to a question of what’s worse — a society that allows people to openly sell their bodies, or one that tolerates the ugly conditions and dangers that face prostitutes under our current legal framework.
Judging from the blog posts and web comments that spewed forth in the wake of the ruling, it seems most people consider that an easy question to answer, and regard those on the opposite side with contempt. But it’s hopeless to try to resolve these things by dueling over vice and virtue. Morality is a lousy thing to base a legal system on, because there are no universal principles. There are things I consider immoral that are perfectly legal, and there are crimes in which the moral dimension is negligible, or at least debatable. It’s true that things should not be legalized simply because there is a market demand for them — we humans have certain appetites that need to be constrained by law. But nor should things be prohibited simply because most people find them distasteful. Do we all own our bodies or not?
As we fumble around looking for the right thing to do, we need to make a distinction between things that are illegal because they are harmful, and things that are harmful because they are illegal. In the case of prostitution, the worst aspects of the business are exacerbated by the fact that it must take place in secret.
Prostitutes call themselves “sex trade workers” for a reason. They are not after society’s blessing, but rather recognition of the fact that theirs is an industry — one that ought to be sanctioned and regulated rather than ignored and reviled.
It’s not a question of whether we want a sex trade in Canada. We have one. Always have and always will. The issue is what kind of sex trade we ought to have, and whether we have the stomach to take control of it. Right now, the trade is largely controlled by thugs and lowlifes who prey on the vulnerable. It need not be that way.
It’s true that there is no jurisdiction where the sex trade works perfectly. Whether it’s Nevada or Amsterdam or New Zealand, lift rocks and you’ll find cockroaches. But frankly, the same could be said of virtually every industry in every nation on earth. (Anybody want to stand up and argue for the fundamental virtue of the financial industry? How about mining? Entertainment?) There are, however, important insights that can be drawn from experience in places where the sex trade has been legalized and regulated.
In Nevada, for instance, brothels are secluded away from residential neighbourhoods. Prostitutes are tested weekly for STDs, monthly for HIV, and condoms are mandatory. Working conditions are monitored by state labour authorities. Perhaps most important, when customers get out of line or abusive, working girls call the police. Right now in Canada, none of the above protections exist and, as the Robert Pickton case amply demonstrates, the consequences for women who ply the sex trade in the shadows of society can be truly horrific.
In a perfect world, perhaps there would be no market for sexual services. Everyone would have the companionship and gratification they crave, and women would all have better options. But here and now, the best we can do is face the world as it is and try to make it better. That means acknowledging that the laws governing the market for sex have created a horrendously unsafe working environment, where organized crime gets wealthy off the flesh of desperate women.
Legalize. Regulate. Tax. And strike a blow against the exploiters of the shadow economy
Gayblackcanada 