Hollywood Double Standards: Are Lesbian Films More Acceptable Than Gay Male Movies?
Lesbian filmmaker Lisa Cholodenko’s new film “The Kids Are All Right” has received overwhelming praise from the mainstream North American press.
Mainstream heterosexual Hollywood movie stars Annette Benning and Julianne Moore star as the lesbian couple. However, there is a subversive vein of homophobia and sexism to this movie.
For example, lesbian relationships are acceptable as long as the lesbian couple conforms to heterosexist beauty standards.
North Americans don’t mind watching movies with pretty, slim, white lesbians kissing or having hot sex on the silver screen.
“The Kids Are All Right” doesn’t seem like a movie that is geared towards the gay and lesbian community. This movie is just like a boring TV movie of the week
that should be on the Lifetime channel. “The Kids Are All Right” presents homosexuality that is supposed to “normalizes” our sexual orientation for the rich white
suburban crowd.
It is obvious that Lisa Cholodenko made this movie to attract heterosexual men and this movie is a straight male fantasy.
Annette Benning and Julianne Moore are gorgeous, talented, actresses, and feminine lesbianism is basically now mainstream.
By contrast, Jim Carrey and Ewan McGregor’s gay male romantic comedy “I Love You Phillip Morris” is still having trouble obtaining distribution in North America.
“I Love You Phillip Morris” has already been released in Europe but in North America the release date has been pushed back to October 2010.
The negative press “I Love You Phillip Morris” has received in America is not just abhorrent but also not surprising.
Today, mainstream media outlets such as New York Magazine have posted clips of Jim Carrey engaged in an explicit gay sex scene with another man.
So what is the difference? It is clear that North Americans are fearful of gay male homosexuality, it is a threat to the masculinity of the Hollywood powerbrokers and the people in power in Hollywood.
McGregor and Carrey’s film is a refreshing change to the image Hollywood wants to present about male homosexuality. In the film “I Love You Phillip Morris”, Jim Carey’s character has no conflict about his homosexuality.
The love scenes between McGregor and Carrey are tender and the actors illustrate that gay male love exists. Perhaps the problem is the marketing of “I Love You Phillip Morris”?
Straight people love films such as the pedestrian “Brokeback Mountain” or “Milk” both movies are so repulsive and stereotypical it makes me want to vomit!
“I Love You Phillip Morris” shatters the stereotype that all gay men we have this anguish, angst, and agony about being gay.
The gay sex scenes in “I Love You Phillip Morris” are important because gay men we do have sex. I guess the idea of Carrey and McGregor kissing upsets the
Hollywood powerbrokers.
The fear of North Americans is, the discourse exists that male homosexuality is abhorrent, frightening, and deleterious. “I Love You Phillip Morris” has some groundbreaking scenes of explicit gay male sex scenes.
Hollywood doesn’t want to present gay male relationships as loving, sexually charged, or real.
There are still anxieties about male homosexuality that disrupts the beliefs of heterosexuals.
“I Love You Phillip Morris” was created for an adult audience, so why is there still this fear of gay male love?
The double standards of the mainstream North American press is not only homophobic but also disappointing and annoying.
Meanwhile, “The Kids Are All Right” is about a white, lesbian, upper middle class, suburban family. The movie is derivative and lacking in details. Now I know I will be in a minority for saying this, I just wish there was more diversity in relation to gay and lesbian films.
I am so tired of these movies about white, upper class, gays and lesbians getting all the media attention.
Where are the films about Latina lesbians, Asian lesbians or black lesbians or Aboriginal lesbians on the silver screen?
I yearn for the day when a Holywood superstars of colour such as Samuel L Jackson, Shemar Moore, Will Smith, Jimmy Smits, Halle Berry, Lucy Liu, Angela Bassett, or Jennifer Lopez can headline gay movies.
The dilemma is, homosexuality is still taboo in communities of colour.
Benjamin and Peter Bratt did release their wonderful film “La Mission” a few months ago. “La Mission” is an independent film that challenged the homopbobia,
in Latino American communities.
The Bratt Brothers said they had problems finding financing for “La Mission” because Hollywood believed Americans are not interested in a movie about gay men of colour.
On the internet, some Latinos are upset that the issue of male homosexuality was explored in the film. However, La Mission has grossed over $1 million dollars
proving there is an audience for movies about male homosexuality in communities of colour.
Another quandary is, homosexuality is still viewed by the mainstream as a symbol of whiteness. The ideology is, gay people are white and gays of colour we don’t exist.
I think gays and lesbians of colour we really need to become more organized, mobilized, and create our own movies.
Another problem I have with “The Kids Are All Right” is, why is Mark Ruffalo in the movie? I understand, the teen children of Annette Benning and Julianne Moore search for their sperm donor father.
I am just disgusted that Julianne Moore’s character Jules has an affair with Mark Ruffalo! Does this make sense? A real lesbian would never have sex with a man!
This movie is presenting the homophobic message that some lesbians are sexually attracted to men. Any woman that seeks out men for sex is not a real lesbian
because real lesbians are not interested in having sex with men.
I believe is very irresponsible of Lisa Cholodenko to present this belief that lesbians actually want to have sex with men.
Why didn’t Lisa Cholodenko have a female love interest for Jules if she was going to have an affair?
It is clear to me that Cholodenko was interested in trying to reach a heterosexual, middle class, audience.
Mark Ruffalo’s character was created to make straight people feel safe and comfortable with their own prejudices about lesbian relationships.
There is a homophobic belief that lesbian relationships are not real and two women cannot sexually satisfy each other.
“The Kids Are All Right” was created for the so-called “open-minded” straight people. You know, the kind of straight people who think they are “hip” and “cool” and totally accepting of gays that don’t upset their heterosexist beliefs and values.
Mark Ruffalo’s character is basically a plot device to placate the prejudices of straight folks. This movie is not groundbreaking it is offensive and clearly anti lesbian!


I don’t even think anything like a ‘real lesbian’ exists. You’re not a woman nor a lesbian. It is not that simple, to divide people into hetero, bi, les or gay. It’s much more than that, there are as many combination of these things as number of ppl. Everyone is different, do not generalize.
And don’t be critical so much about Cholodenko’s movie. I guess, that was the movie’s purpose, to be a light and nice movie, touching the social itchy subject on the way.
Besides, people as you can see, are not ready for the homosexualism. So to make them used to it we have to start with something easy and light, right?
Hello L, I respect your opinion but I disagree. I feel like the gay rights movement in America should not placate to soothe the prejudices of the heterosexuals. Real lesbians are women that exclusively love other women. Yes, sexuality is fluid but Lisa Cholodenko sold out her lesbian sisters with this movie. The problem I have with “The Kids Are All Right” is it just produces the same anti lesbian stereotypes. Real lesbians don’t want to have sex with men. The reason Cholodenko made this movie was to turn on straight men. Straight men love the idea that they can “fuck” a woman out of her lesbianism. The heterosexual scenes in the movie were disgusting and too graphic for my taste.
I am a gay person and although I am not a lesbian even I can see this movie is placating to the prejudices of heterosexuals. This movie plays it safe it is all about soothing the prejudices the straights have for gay relationships. I am not the only one that is critical of Lisa Cholodenko. On the lesbian website http://www.afterellen.com many lesbians criticized Cholodenko for selling out to the straights!
But still, this movie is not a drama, it’s a comedy, light and no matter how indie this movie is, it’s supposed to be entertaining.
And what entertaning movies do? They’re usually trying to entertain the most audience.
And maybe it’s not supposed to be about a “real lesbian”.
But about a woman who maybe had a history with men or something. Maybe she’s kinda bisexual too. This is like the situation where a hetero finds out that he could be attracted to the same sex.
Just treat it as a movie not a pro-homo guide or strictly homo-entertaining movie. It’s just for all.
Well, I’m a bisexual woman, and I had a lot of fun while watching the movie 🙂