Why Is Playwright Lorraine Hansberry’s Lesbianism Still A Secret In 2008?
The ABC television movie, “A Raisin In The Sun,” will be broadcast on February 25th 2008 at 8:00pm. The television film fulfills the black quota for “black history month”. Pop star Sean Combs. is the protagonist Walter Lee Younger. The title of the movie refers to black gay poet Langston Hughes poem “Harlem”.
African American lesbian playwright Lorraine Hansberry’s legendary play, once again, will be brought back to television to reach a new generation next week. Hansberry was the first black lesbian playwright to have a play produced on Broadway in 1959. “A Raisin In the Sun” was a huge success for Hansberry and launched her career.
The general public of course does not know that Lorraine Hansberry was a lesbian due to homophobia. Why is black lesbianism considered “private” yet “heterosexuality” is a part of the public domain? Although Hansberry married a white Jewish man, Robert Nemiroff in 1953, the couple separated in 1957 and divorced in 1964.Hansberry was conscious of her lesbian identity and she negotiated between the public and private spheres. Black lesbians encountered racism from the mainstream, white gay culture, and also persecution from heterosexual blacks.
Lorraine Hansberry’s lesbian identity emerges from the articles she wrote for the lesbian publication “The Ladder” in the late 1950s. Hansberry did not use her full name when she wrote articles for “The Ladder” she used her initials L.H. instead. In the 1950s, in America, gays and lesbians lived in fear due to witch hunts against homosexuals. Black lesbian women encountered a triple form of oppression in relation to their race, gender, and sexual orientation.
Can you imagine the difficulties black lesbians endured in the 1950s? Homosexuality was still considered a mental illness that can be cured. The topic of human sexuality was still taboo in the 1950s. America was sexually repressed due to heterosexual male domination and male supremacy. The racial and sexual apartheid existed in the United States and black lesbians lived in constant danger due to racism, sexism and homophobia. The civil rights and gay movements did not gather strength until the 1960s.
Black lesbians encountered racism from white lesbians and were barred from entering white lesbian bars and establishments during the 1950s. Black lesbians also endured gender discrimination due to being women and unwanted sexual advances of dangerous, violent, and hostile heterosexual men.
Hansberry was indeed a lesbian but this important component of black queer history should not be erased by the homophobic Occidental world. Heterosexual black publications always ignore the important fact Hansberry was a lesbian. I didn’t know Lorraine Hansberry was a lesbian until I read lesbian activist, feminist, poet, and writer Adrienne Rich’s incisive essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence”. Rich’s analysis is correct society attempts to erase, diminish, and destroy the contributions of lesbians in many ways. I believe the silence about Lorraine Hansberry’s lesbianism is due to the negative attitude that still exists against homosexuals.
Why is the term lesbianism treated like a scatological word? One argument is some straights believe “it doesn’t matter” and if people discover that Lorraine Hansberry was a black lesbian it might “scare people off” from watching the movie. Why is there this invisible code and this silent barrier? If black lesbian emancipation is to occur why is black lesbianism still a social taboo? Society appears to have a love and hate relationship with lesbianism.
The political, cultural, social, and artistic merits of black lesbians such as Lorraine Hansberry must be celebrated and not treated as some shameful abhorrent secret. It is the year 2008 so why are we still reticent? Why hasn’t this final chasm been shattered and the truth still shrouded in silence? Lorraine Hansberry proves that black gay people care about the black community.
Often heterosexual blacks believe black gays and lesbians only focus on sexual orientation and ignore race. Lorraine Hansberry proves through art that she was cognizant of the racial, social and political polemics blacks endured during the civil rights era. “A Raisin In The Sun”, is about a fictional story about a black family struggling to survive in 1950s Chicago at a time when America’s social and racial apartheid was at full strength.
Virtually all the articles published about “A Raisin In The Sun” always mentions Lorraine Hansberry’s race and her gender but excludes her sexual orientation. The question is why? It appears in the year 2008 homophobia reigns supreme. Lesbianism is more then just a sexual act there is more to lesbianism then just sex. Lesbians are women that are not sexually attracted to men but there is an illogical fear of lesbianism in society that lesbians are anti male.
Lorraine Hansberry lived a double life a life where she constantly was in fear that the heterosexist matrix would discriminate against her since she was a black lesbian. The real Lorraine Hansberry is blurred between the printed lines of “A Raisin In The Sun”. The sentences, paragraphs, thoughts, feelings, emotions, and doubt, lives in Lorraine Hansberry’s groundbreaking play. “A Raisin In The Sun” is about emancipation and personal determination I believe this also relates to the struggles gays and lesbians encounter. Perhaps Hansberry used her play as a metaphor to explore the internal struggles she endured during her own life?
Lorraine Hansberry’s incredible groundbreaking play proves that black gay and lesbian people were cognizant of the struggles blacks endured in the mid 20th century. Hansberry wanted to bring a greater awareness to the incredible racism, sexism, and economic discrimination African Americans experienced in the United States.
Lorraine Hansberry is very important she shattered an artistic and cultural barrier in the performing arts. It is such a disservice to ignore Hansberry was a lesbian. Lorraine Hansberry’s lesbian identity should not be concealed in the shadows and be treated as an afterthought. I believe it is imperative, and crucial that there be a dialogue about how Hansberry’s play relates to her lesbian identity. It is simply disgraceful that the mainstream press to ignore and attempt to erase the importance of lesbianism in Lorraine Hansberry’s life and art.
The articles Lorraine Hansberry wrote for “The Ladder” are very passionate and powerful she wrote about the struggles she endured as a black lesbian woman in the mid 20th century. Legendary African American actors Ruby Dee and Sidney Poitier were the stars of the original stage version of the play and the 1961 feature film. Sadly, Lorraine Hansberry died in her prime at the tender age of thirty four in 1965 due to pancreatic cancer. Lorraine Hansberry died at a very young age she was such an incredible talent.
The press have showered the movie with a lot of praise saying the three hour film is a testament of Hansberry’s incredible talent. The cast includes Phylicia Rashad, Sanaa Lathan, Audra McDonald, and the omnipotent Sean Combs. I will admit I might take a peek at the movie. However, I am not impressed that Sean Combs or P Diddy or whatever that guy calls himself is the star of the film. I wanted a younger black male actor to be the star of the movie.
The crisis in black Hollywood is the paucity of film roles available for young black actors. I am sure some black actors are seething right now that Sean Combs is the star of the film. In white Hollywood you rarely ever see a “singer” attain a prestigious movie role these days. Can you imagine Jon Bon Jovi as the star in a movie about Elvis? So why is there a double standard for black Hollywood? Why do untalented bottom feeders such as Sean Combs get to the be star of such an important movie?
I really feel for the talented young black male actors that are training hard at various universities, colleges, theater programs, across North America and the world. The only reason Sean Combs was hired is due to greed. The producers and director behind the television film believe Combs can generate huge ratings for ABC television. ABC television will hype this movie to the maximum I just believe a talented and much younger black actor should of chosen for the male lead.
The lead in “A Raisin In The Sun” Walter Lee Younger is a young black man and Sean Combs is thirty eight years old. Since Combs in thirty eight one argument is he can bring “maturity” to the role. However, I believe the feeling of naivety and optimism is diminished for the character Walter Lee Younger due to Combs advanced age.
A younger black male actor possibly someone between the ages of twenty five to perhaps thirty two should of been chosen for the role. Combs is simply not talented enough and too old for the part. Combs is also a rap artist he’s a wannabe actor he is not a serious dramatic actor. I have so much sympathy for the talented black actors that want to become stars in Hollywood but are not given the opportunity.
Why does Hollywood continue to insult the audience and cast these talentless flakes such as Sean Combs in such prestigious roles? The barriers for black actors in Hollywood are incredible there are limited opportunities to advance up the Hollywood star system. Twenty five years ago perhaps an unknown black male actor would of been chosen for the lead role. Hollywood is profit driven and the ideology is since Sean Combs already is successful in various demographics his fans will fans will flock to watch the movie. However, does talent not matter anymore?
Why do young blacks in Hollywood have to always be singers or dancers in order to breakthrough and get the big movie roles? Beyonce just won the lead role in a biopic about the legendary singer Etta James. I cringe because Beyonce is not an actress she needs acting lessons. Beyonce cannot act she requires an acting coach and numerous hours to learning the craft of acting.
Young talented unknown black actors are being disrespected and ignored. A young black male actor with talent would of been electrifying in the role of Walter Lee Younger. A young black actor could of brought pathos, complexity, sensitivity, and range to this very important role. Unfortunately, Hollywood is now all about profit margins, ratings, and the craft of acting is now secondary. The only glimmer of hope is that young people will learn more about Lorraine Hansberry and gain an appreciation for her incredible talent.


I have always believed that Lorraine’s lesbianism is ignored out of fear and just plain old ignorance. Some hide behind the fact that it doesn’t matter…and it doesn’t in the meaning of it affecting her work’s excellence. But the fear of discussing it, just as we try to deny the rights of gays and lesbians today, is abhorrent and doesn’t pay tribute to her as a person.
As far as Diddy in this movie, there are so many others that could have done so much better…I don’t have anything against him, but an actor he is not. He may want to be, but that is a totally different story…
I agree I firmly believe Lorraine Hansberry’s lesbian identity is a very important component of understanding the “real” Lorraine Hansberry. The mainstream wants this important critical area of Lorraine’s life to remain hidden in the shadows as if it was some horrible secret. It isn’t right, in fact, I believe Lorraine Hansberry’s lesbian identity can help us to understand her life and personality a bit more.
Why is Hansberry’s lesbianism so little known? For one reason, she kept it a secret. For another, her widower did also. For a third, it has no bearing whatsoever on her work — except for her snide depictions of gay men in “The Sign in Sidney Brustein’s Window” and “Les Blancs.” And for a fourth: because scholars interested in gay issues spend little time doing research and more time writing screeds.
Sean Combs is in this film for one reason and one reason only; she loves the stage. Period.
Thinking about the struggles of lesbian and gay folks in that period makes me sad. 😦
People still are closeted today as if we were in the 1950’s.
SMH.
TBA -did you mean to type “she” loves the stage?
You are funny!
@IW
I hope not.
Tee hee hee.
Puffy or Sean whichever should never have been allowed to play this important role. Mr.Portier being the gentelman he is allowed him the priveledge to play this role with his blessing. He never should condoned it. He is horrible!!!
this is a very inciteful piece, and i do agree that her lesbian identity is purposefully hidden. it’s something i have rarely heard/ read about. i also agree that diddy has no place in this role. he doesn’t have the presence required to carry if off with feeling. this dude can’t even rap; he has no significant relationship with the artful use of words. it just cheapens the lines and the emotions behind them when they come out of his mouth.
@Tammytee, thanks for your comment about Lorraine Hansberry. I agree the silence about Lorraine’s lesbianism is a sign of the entrenched homophobia that still exists in society. it is very homophobic for the black media to ignore the fact Lorraine was a lesbian. Lorraine’s lesbian identity shouldn’t be hidden nor should it be treated as a shameful secret.
I co sign about P Diddy is a horrible actor and his performance in “A Raisin In The Sun” is absolutely abhorrent. Sean Combs is so arrogant the guy couldn’t act his way out of a toilet bowl.
It is interesting that when I searched for what killed Lorraine Hansberry — she and I are (were) near the same age — I put her name plus “illness” and I got this message that she had been a lesbian. It is still considered and illness? Whoa.
When did she admit to being a lesbian? She has written letters to THE LADDER but they in no way conveyed that she was a lesbian. People kill me with assuming that when you support an issue that you are one. I support the LGBT community every chance I get and I’m as straight as a board. So she was gay because she didn’t have children, a mate or because no one saw her publically with a man. My thing is this, if she was then good on her but don’t assume that she was based on unfounded information. If she didn’t say she was lesbian than she wasn’t…Period. Just be happy that she graced us with her talent and left us with a legacy.
Elvada Seleithia, your argument makes no sense? So because you never saw Lorraine engage in lesbian sex in the 1960s you do not believe she was a lesbian? Even though there is historical evidence and proof Lorraine wrote for the lesbian publication The Ladder. There is proof that Lorraine did write about the struggles she experienced as a black lesbian when she wrote for the The Ladder. You casually ignore the incredible discrimination black lesbians experienced in the 1950s and 1960s. Black lesbians had to negotiate between the public and private spheres.
Elvada Seleithia you are forgetting about the era Lorraine Hansberry lived in during the 1950s and 1960s it was still taboo to be a lesbian. The Ladder was a lesbian publication for lesbians. Lorraine lived in a different time and space of course she could not “come out” as a lesbian back then. The Ladder was a lesbian publication for lesbians. Lesbian feminist Adrienne Rich points out in her incredible essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality & Lesbian Existence” that Lorraine used her initials L.H. The reason Lorraine used her initials and not her full name was due to fear of a backlash. Lorraine was cognizant of the fact she had to hide her lesbianism in order to survive.
that is so good becuase i saw your move ”A Raisin In The Sun” so thank you
orvillelloyddouglas:
I do read and I read alot. It still does not negate the fact that I wasn’t there in her relationships with a female and I don’t think anyone on here was there. Since I didn’t see it with my eyes and I didn’t read anything she wrote admitting to it then I won’t speculate. If she was then that’s great and if she wasn’t than so beit. I just don’t like labeling anyone unless THEY, themselves, deem that they are.
I never knew this. I did not see the relevancy of the revelation of her being a lesbian at first, but the article struck a cord within me. Removing the church dogma I grew up the author brings home a point: every person worthy of study and note needs to be known and studied in his/her totality. It brings clarity. I know clarity is not an American trait, but without it much is misunderstood.
-Gregory E Woods, Keeper of Stories
Elvada Seleithia I saw you on a Zanes Sex Chronicles episode. I was struck by your presence and the power emanating from you. I read a couple of bios about you. Impressive upbringing and outlook on life. I encourage you to keep working, and applying that extra something that defines and distinguishes you on stage or screen. Your approach to the question and lifestyle of the gay community is reflective of the times you were born into. As an older guy the view I share with my generation encourages you on one hand and on the other it gives an insight into human development American style.
We, as a nation, do not employ introspection often enough. It is too revelatory. What we do is leave out large pieces of history from the ears and education of our children. This approach is a guided approach that skips steps in the development of an intellectual life. I am not going to plunge into the theories of education but your bioographies tell a lot about your openess. I trust that your life will bring thought and change for the times you were born into.
-Gregory E. Woods
@Gregory E. Woods
Hello and thank you for encouragement. I honestly and deeply appreciate it. I forgot all about the Sex Chronicles! That’s too cool!
Yes, I am very open about different aspects on life and I very well advocate for the gay community but I am unsure as to what you mean by, “Your approach to the question and lifestyle of the gay community is reflective of the times you were born into”. I am by no means discounting the struggles of the gay community in yesteryears. What I’m saying is she could have very well just been an advocate like myself. No one knows of anything else about her gay lifestyle unless there is something I have not read or viewed. I just don’t like labeling a person w/o justification. We know of other writers who never said they were gay but there were clear signs but I just don’t know of anything of LH’s lifestyle besides her contribution to the Ladder. Maybe I need to read more into it or maybe I can’t find anything b/c there is nothing there. Like I said, if she was gay then that is great and I applaud that but if not then, maybe that’s why it’s so ‘taboo’.
esw
BTW I’m stealing this for my blogspot so thank you and I agree:)….”What we do is leave out large pieces of history from the ears and education of our children.”
Rock on, Elvada! It annoys me when people rewrite other people’s stories, especially posthumously. I think Lorraine Hansberry should be remembered as she wanted to be remembered.